<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jack's page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pinette.org/jack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pinette.org/jack</link>
	<description>...where jack sometimes does stuff, but mostly not</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 22:22:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>which house?</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2010/05/25/which-house/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2010/05/25/which-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 22:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re trying to buy a house in Champaign / Urbana IL, since Holly&#8217;s going to start her doctoral program there this fall. We haven&#8217;t actually sold our house in Iowa yet, so we can&#8217;t really proceed.

But we&#8217;ve found a couple of places we really like in Champaign. Interestingly, we like them for almost totally different ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re trying to buy a house in Champaign / Urbana IL, since Holly&#8217;s going to start her doctoral program there this fall. We haven&#8217;t actually sold our house in Iowa yet, so we can&#8217;t really proceed.</p>

<p>But we&#8217;ve found a couple of places we really like in Champaign. Interestingly, we like them for almost totally different reasons. Which should we buy, if we had our choice?</p>

<h3>THE CAMBRIDGE HOUSE</h3>

<p>The Cambridge house is smallish, but exquisite &#8212; it&#8217;s been worked over by someone with good taste and a sharp eye. It&#8217;s nice from the outside, but stunning inside.</p>

<p>The kitchen is a marvel &#8212; a cooking show should be filmed there, really. In addition to seating at the center island, there&#8217;s seating to one side at a bar, which contains a small bar fridge and a wine fridge as well. </p>

<p>The master bathroom has a shower, but also a deep whirlpool tub. Oh, geez, that bathroom. Wow.</p>

<p>Here&#8217;s the ad copy:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Extensive upgrades! Entertain in a new gourmet kitchen with custom cherry cabinets, marble countertops, breakfast bar, and island. Relax in a huge master suite with double vanity, travertine tile, whirlpool tub, custom glass shower, walk-in closet with floor-to-ceiling shoe rack, and French doors opening to a stone patio in a beautiful backyard. Roof new in 2006 and high-efficiency AC new in 2007.</p>
</blockquote>

<p><img src="http://pinette.org/jack/wp2/images//cabridge-ext.jpg" alt="cambridge exterior" title="cabridge-ext.jpg" border="0" width="289" height="189" /> <img src="http://pinette.org/jack/wp2/images//cambridge-dining1.jpg" alt="cambridge dining" title="cambridge-dining.jpg" border="0" width="290" height="193" /> <img src="http://pinette.org/jack/wp2/images//cambridge-kitchen.jpg" alt="cambridge kitchen" title="cambridge-kitchen.jpg" border="0" width="289" height="189" /> <img src="http://pinette.org/jack/wp2/images//cabridge-bath.jpg" alt="cabridge bath" title="cabridge-bath.jpg" border="0" width="293" height="190" /></p>

<p>There are a couple of potential problems though. First, we need a bigger place than we are in now, particularly since I&#8217;ll be working from home. I&#8217;m told it&#8217;s really important to have a separate working space, and I won&#8217;t have a room for that here &#8212; there&#8217;s a third bedroom, but it&#8217;ll have to double as an office and a space for things like the futon and Wii, etc. Not ideal.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m a little worried about reselling it in the future. The neighborhood is decent but not great, and it only has a one-car garage; therefore the selling points have to do with how beautiful and well-kept it is. Will we be able to keep it so nice? Maybe not.</p>

<p><strong>Pros:</strong> </p>

<ul>
<li>Gorgeous</li>
<li>nice stone facade</li>
<li>awesome cabinesque wooden interior walls</li>
<li>floors are wood and ceramic</li>
<li>kitchen is huge, with tons of marble countertop and an island with seating</li>
<li>huge master bathroom with deep whirlpool tub</li>
<li>nice backyard with fire pit, stone patio, shed, small swingset/slide combo</li>
<li>Neighborhood with kids</li>
</ul>

<p><strong>Cons:</strong></p>

<ul>
<li>No separate office space for moi</li>
<li>No separate living room/family room</li>
<li>one-car garage</li>
<li>nearest school has less-than-stellar rep</li>
<li>not small (1900 sq ft) but use of space makes it feel smallish, somehow</li>
<li>not so close to anything (University, parks, shops)</li>
</ul>

<h3>THE BROOKSHIRE HOUSE</h3>

<p>The Brookshire place is larger, and older. It has a nice layout, with 3 bedrooms upstairs and a single bedroom on the first floor with its own half-bathroom, and a door to close it off from the rest of the house &#8212; ideal office space.</p>

<p>Along with a living room/dining room combo, it has a separate family room with a nice fireplace, and patio doors opening to a screened porch, which is not quite 4-season but pretty well constructed.</p>

<p>The yard is awesome: half a dozen mature trees and a nice garden area as well as a sizeable lawn (which needs some attention and reseeding, but isn&#8217;t in terrible shape).</p>

<p>Here&#8217;s the ad copy:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Great neighborhood, mature trees, LOW COUNTY TAXES, custom built one owner home, poured concrete partial basement, first floor bedroom or office, lots of hardwood, completely repainted inside, maintenance free exterior, large park-like back yard, screened in porch off family room, patio is equipped with a natural gas line for your grill, replacement windows throughout the second floor, upstairs half bath has room to install a shower, 6 year old furnace and 4 year old water heater. Did I mention the LOW COUNTY TAXES?</p>
</blockquote>

<p><img src="http://pinette.org/jack/wp2/images//brookshire_ext.jpg" alt="brookshire exterior" title="brookshire_ext.jpg" border="0" width="287" height="201" /> <img src="http://pinette.org/jack/wp2/images//brookshire_yard.jpg" alt="brookshire yard" title="brookshire_yard.jpg" border="0" width="290" height="199" /> <img src="http://pinette.org/jack/wp2/images//brookshire_stairs.jpg" alt="brookshire stairs" title="brookshire_stairs.jpg" border="0" width="289" height="200" /> <img src="http://pinette.org/jack/wp2/images//brookshire_bedroom.jpg" alt="brookshire bedroom" title="brookshire_bedroom.jpg" border="0" width="289" height="200" /></p>

<p>This house was clearly a custom-built job, and it&#8217;s clearly been loved, but is not immaculate like the Cambridge house. It does have nice wood floors in some rooms, but other areas are carpeted and the carpet is a little worn. More worrisome, the roof looks old; it&#8217;s a 42-year-old house so it&#8217;s probably near the end of life for its second roof.</p>

<p><strong>Pros:</strong></p>

<ul>
<li>large, usable space</li>
<li>separate living room / dining room</li>
<li>first-floor office with door, its own bathroom</li>
<li>3 bedrooms upstairs; one can be an office/reading nook for Holly</li>
<li>2-car garage</li>
<li>3-season rear porch, and a small porch in front</li>
<li>beautiful yard with mature trees</li>
<li>pretty neighborhood</li>
<li>LOW COUNTY TAXES lol</li>
<li>somewhat close to a park, shops, etc.</li>
</ul>

<p><strong>Cons:</strong></p>

<ul>
<li>probably needs a roof, or will soon</li>
<li>somewhat dingy carpet (in carpeted areas)</li>
<li>sliding door (and some windows) old and sticky to move</li>
<li>can already tell it will be a PITA to clean the gutters; there&#8217;ll be lots of yard maintenance</li>
* 
</ul>

<h2>SUPER BONUS ROUND</h2>

<p>This last house isn&#8217;t even on the market, but a little birdie tells us it will be in a week or two. It was the first house we researched online when Holly was applying to her doctoral program. It was purchased in January, but the purchaser never moved in and is now selling (health problems or something).</p>

<h3>THE URBANA HOUSE</h3>

<p>I don&#8217;t know the footage, but it&#8217;s fairly spacious &#8212; 3 bedrooms upstairs, plus a bedroom / office downstairs (basement office, nice and cool! I like it!). There&#8217;s also a downstairs family room. </p>

<p>It&#8217;s all-brick on the outside, built in the 1940s, and has a two-car garage separated from the house by a breezeway, which I love. The yard is not big, but it&#8217;s close to two parks.</p>

<p>Perhaps the best feature is the neighborhood: it&#8217;s in Urbana, surrounded by quite nice houses and super close to the University &#8212; even a pretty part of the University (tree-lined picnic area and tennis courts). Some of you know what I mean when I say it looks like some parts of Iowa City&#8217;s east side; it&#8217;s not on a cobbled street, but the cobbles begin about a block to the north. :) It has picturesque streetlights.</p>

<p>No photos, which is a bummer, because it&#8217;s a nice place to look at. This is maybe my favorite one, even though it&#8217;s not even available for sale yet. ::sigh::</p>

<p><strong>Pros:</strong></p>

<ul>
<li>Plenty of space</li>
<li>downstairs office</li>
<li>downstairs family room, separate from living/dining area upstairs</li>
<li>extra bedroom upstairs for Holly&#8217;s office/reading nook</li>
<li>two car garage with awesome breezeway connection</li>
<li>close to two nice parks</li>
<li>in Urbana, so it&#8217;s possible to predict which school Daphne will go to, which is absurdly impossible for Champaign</li>
<li>the two closest schools have good reputations</li>
<li>lots of lone female joggers when we drove by, which says to me &#8220;safe neighborhood&#8221;</li>
<li>well-kept; doesn&#8217;t appear to need, say, a new roof or major work anywhere</li>
<li>beautiful neighborhood with mature trees, etc.</li>
<li>4 blocks from campus</li>
<li>8 blocks from Campus Recreation Center East</li>
</ul>

<p><strong>Cons:</strong></p>

<ul>
<li>not actually, uh, for sale right now</li>
<li>we&#8217;ve seen a video walkthrough but have not actually been inside</li>
<li>no idea if there are kids for Daphne to play with</li>
</ul>

<p>ZOMG that was tiring.</p>

<p>So, uh. What should we do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2010/05/25/which-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>macabre interrupted</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2010/05/05/macabre-interrupted/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2010/05/05/macabre-interrupted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 17:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cultcher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I stumbled on this today, and though I vaguely remember writing it, I have no idea why I did. 

What was I going for here? It seems like I wrote the downer opening but never got around to the inspirational finish. Whatever that might have been.


  It&#8217;s tough to think about, but we are ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stumbled on this today, and though I vaguely remember writing it, I have no idea why I did. </p>

<p>What was I going for here? It seems like I wrote the downer opening but never got around to the inspirational finish. Whatever that might have been.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>It&#8217;s tough to think about, but we are all going to die.  </p>
  
  <p>Of course, we&#8217;re always dying. Right now, as you sit reading this, millions of your cells are dying every second. They are replaced by new cells, as your cells are also constantly reproducing by mitosis, turning one copy into two.  </p>
  
  <p>But these copies are imperfect. The generational fidelity is high, but not high enough.  Eventually the tiny mistakes add up: into lesions, abcesses, bone spurs, cancer.  </p>
  
  <p>Someday the chemical processes that keep your body intact, that keep your brain functional and your thoughts lubricated, that keep your blood pumping and your lungs inflating, will fall out of alignment or below a certain level of efficiency, and then the decline will be swift; in particular, once your heart stops circulating the blood that both cleans and fuels your tissues, it&#8217;s all over but the mess.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Geez! Mr. Downer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2010/05/05/macabre-interrupted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>peanut soup</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2010/03/15/peanut-soup/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2010/03/15/peanut-soup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cultcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recipe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been trying to hunt down a decent peanut soup recipe; the last one I tried was sort of wan, and most of the ones I&#8217;ve seen online don&#8217;t look like they have enough peanut butter in them.

Soooooo here&#8217;s the one I&#8217;m trying tonight. It&#8217;s an adaptation of this one.

4 ripe tomatoes
2 sweet potatoes
a bit ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to hunt down a decent peanut soup recipe; the last one I tried was sort of wan, and most of the ones I&#8217;ve seen online don&#8217;t look like they have enough peanut butter in them.</p>

<p>Soooooo here&#8217;s the one I&#8217;m trying tonight. It&#8217;s an adaptation of <a href="http://closetcooking.blogspot.com/2009/04/sweet-potato-and-peanut-soup.html">this one</a>.</p>

<p>4 ripe tomatoes<br />
2 sweet potatoes<br />
a bit of olive oil<br />
1 onion (diced)<br />
1 large carrot (peeled and diced)<br />
1 red pepper (diced)<br />
1 poblano (seeded and diced)<br />
1 jalapeno (seeded and diced)<br />
2 cloves garlic (minced)<br />
4 cups chicken stock<br />
1/2 cup natural chunky peanut butter<br />
leftover chicken (optional)  </p>

<p>Start by roasting the tomatoes and sweet potatoes. </p>

<p>Heat the oven to 400F, then prep the tomatoes by scoring them, blanching for 60 seconds in boiling water (remove promptly!), and then peeling off their skins. It&#8217;s supposed to help if you shock them in cold water right after you pull them from the boil, but I&#8217;ve never bothered.</p>

<p>Core and halve the peeled tomatoes, and place them cut side up in a roasting pan. Don&#8217;t bother seeding them; you&#8217;ll want the extra liquid anyway.</p>

<p>Halve the sweet potatoes as well; brush the cut sides with olive oil, and place cut side down in the roasting pan. Sprinkle some olive oil over the tomatoes, and roast the whole mess for about 45 minutes.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, chop your onions, carrot, and peppers. I&#8217;m such a klutz that this takes like 30 minutes anyway, so the timing is great. I was meticulous with the hot peppers, and my reward was NOT getting capsaicin in my eye afterward. Alton Brown would be so proud.</p>

<p>Heat a bit more oil in a soup pot and saute the onions, carrot, and peppers for a few minutes, until they soften. I like to do this on medium heat; it&#8217;s more forgiving. Add the garlic for the last minute or so.</p>

<p>Pour in the stock and then add the roasted tomatoes, then scoop out the soft caramelized guts from the sweet potato skins and add those too. The guts, not the skins.</p>

<p>Bring to a boil, then lower heat and simmer for 20 or 30 minutes. Hit it with a stick blender until it&#8217;s mostly smooth but still chunky enough to be interesting. I aimed for like 85% blended. </p>

<p>Add the peanut butter and stir to combine, then add the chicken if you&#8217;re using it (I had a cup or so of leftover roasted chicken on hand). Simmer on low for a few more minutes. Salt and pepper to taste.</p>

<p>This turned out pretty well, but predictably, I added too much peanut butter (more like 3/4 or maybe 1 cup, not the 1/2 cup I listed above). The peanut butter ended up dominating more than you&#8217;d probably want. Lesson learned! Apparently those other recipes knew what they were talking about.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s still quite tasty, though. When I make it again, apart from holding back on the PB, I&#8217;ll probably keep a bit more of the seed and membrane of the hot peppers; this time I threw almost all of it out, and they ended up contributing fruit flavor but hardly any heat.</p>

<p>No pics. Somebody (ahem) took my iPhone to Champaign for a couple of days, and I can&#8217;t find the actual camera.</p>

<p>This recipe contained no butter, which may mean I&#8217;ve voided the warranty on the huge Paula Deen stockpot I got for my birthday (thanks Mauria and Bryon!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2010/03/15/peanut-soup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>awesome salsa</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2010/02/13/awesome-salsa/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2010/02/13/awesome-salsa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cultcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recipe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome salsa:

1 can black beans, drained and rinsed
1 small can corn, drained
1/2 a red onion, chopped
2 large tomatoes, seeded and chopped
1/2 cup cilantro, chopped
2 garlic cloves, minced
1 1/2 tsp ground cumin
1 can Ro-tel tomato/chile blend, drained
1/2 can Ro-tel &#8220;hot&#8221; variety, drained.
2 limes 

Grab a largeish bowl; dump and stir. Not the limes though. You only ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome salsa:</p>

<p>1 can black beans, drained and rinsed<br />
1 small can corn, drained<br />
1/2 a red onion, chopped<br />
2 large tomatoes, seeded and chopped<br />
1/2 cup cilantro, chopped<br />
2 garlic cloves, minced<br />
1 1/2 tsp ground cumin<br />
1 can <a href="http://ro-tel.com/">Ro-tel</a> tomato/chile blend, drained<br />
1/2 can Ro-tel &#8220;hot&#8221; variety, drained.<br />
2 limes </p>

<p>Grab a largeish bowl; dump and stir. Not the limes though. You only want their juice. </p>

<p>Cover and refridgerate for as long as you can stand. </p>

<p>Is this the best salsa ever in the WHOLE WORLD?&#8217;</p>

<p>No. But it&#8217;s my first attempt, and I like it.</p>

<p><p><a href="http://pinette.org/jack/wp2/images//l_2048_1536_B30BEA4D-93A9-4F64-B969-60F1A25C339C.jpeg"><img src="http://pinette.org/jack/wp2/images//l_2048_1536_B30BEA4D-93A9-4F64-B969-60F1A25C339C.jpeg" alt="" class="alignnone size-full" style="width: 75%" /></a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2010/02/13/awesome-salsa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>unhealthy debate</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/07/29/unhealthy-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/07/29/unhealthy-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The current national discussion of health care has been marked by awful lies and incredible stupidity. Trying to keep up with the debate is a mentally punishing task. I mean, who can stand having to listen to stuff like this?



This is the level of deep thinking displayed by opponents of healthcare reform. 

Elsewhere, other health ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current national discussion of health care has been marked by awful lies and incredible stupidity. Trying to keep up with the debate is a mentally punishing task. I mean, who can stand having to listen to stuff like this?</p>

<p><object width="320" height="260"><param name="movie" value="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/mediaplayer316.swf"></param><param name="flashvars" value="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg?flv=http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/video/2009/07/27/fnc-20090727-canada.flv"></param><embed src="http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/flash/mediaplayer316.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="config=http://mediamatters.org/embed/cfg?flv=http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/video/2009/07/27/fnc-20090727-canada.flv" width="320" height="260"></embed></object></p>

<p>This is the level of deep thinking displayed by opponents of healthcare reform. </p>

<p>Elsewhere, other health care reform opponents are engaged in <a href="http://www.acreativerevolution.ca/node/1944" title="lying ads about Canadian health care">flat-out lying and fearmongering</a> about universal health care systems elsewhere in the world, and making <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_07/019145.php" title="Mitch McConnell is crazy">absurd declarations that our current system is &#8220;the finest in the world&#8221;</a>.</p>

<p>Our health care system is not the best, nor even close, on any objective measure. </p>

<ul>
<li>We have shittier outcomes for things like life expectancy and infant mortality than any number of other &#8220;civilized&#8221; countries</li>
<li>We have hordes of uninsured people without regular access to preventive care, which is of course <em>cheaper</em> than emergency response care</li>
<li>We have even more middle-class folks who are underinsured and can be driven to bankruptcy and family disaster by medical costs</li>
<li>Even people with wonderful health insurance (like me) are constrained from changing jobs or starting small businesses because health insurance is tied to employment, and you often can&#8217;t change insurance if you have a &#8220;pre-existing condition&#8221;.  </li>
</ul>

<p>For the privilege of maintaining this shitty, unfair, godawful system, we pay <a href="http://www.healthreform.gov/reports/inaction/" title="our stupid system costs a lot"><em>twice as much</em> for healthcare as the rest of the world</a>.</p>

<p>Don&#8217;t mistake me for a fan of the currently proposed reforms; they don&#8217;t go nearly far enough, and any serious attempts at reform will be blocked by craven &#8220;centrist&#8221; Democrats, not by the universally despised Republican congressional minority. This is not a Democrats-vs-Republicans, liberals-vs-conservatives question; neither group wants to upset their corporate donors by disrupting the profit flow to HMOs and the like.</p>

<p>The question is: will we build access to health care into the basic infrastructure of our country, like roads and schools and law enforcement? Or will we punt and keep our terrible, unfair system in place for another 15 or 20 years before reform can be considered again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/07/29/unhealthy-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>quark update</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/05/07/quark-update/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/05/07/quark-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cultcher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was pretty good!

It ended up sort of a weird process; most quark recipes are acid-set (you ferment the milk until the curd breaks) but I was attempting a lazier and shortcuttier version that introduces a bit of rennet partway through the culturing process. The rennet had no effect that I could see, though&#8230; so ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was pretty good!</p>

<p>It ended up sort of a weird process; most quark recipes are acid-set (you ferment the milk until the curd breaks) but I was attempting a lazier and shortcuttier version that introduces a bit of rennet partway through the culturing process. The rennet had no effect that I could see, though&#8230; so I left it longer and it ended up getting two full days of fermentation. That&#8217;s still well within the range I saw in various recipes, but by then I was getting impatient again and so I put the whole kit in an oven set to &#8220;warm&#8221; and voila, two hours later the curd broke.</p>

<p>I left it to drain through cheesecloth overnight and then attacked the slightly-hardened curd with a hand blender.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jackpinette/3510679490/" title="quark by flwombat, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3654/3510679490_a542492b5a.jpg" width="500" height="400" alt="quark" /></a></p>

<p>The result was a texture somewhere between cottage cheese and cream cheese, although it doesn&#8217;t taste like either IMO. I had some for lunch yesterday with a fruit cup and some raw broccoli and it was pretty awesome. I mixed about 3oz. with a teaspoon of honey for dessert last night and that was pretty awesome as well.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t know the nutritional info since I made this myself, but off-the-shelf skim milk quark has something like 22 cal/oz, with about 4g protein and 1.5g carbs. I used 2% milk so my quark will have some fat in it.</p>

<p>I haven&#8217;t tried making sahnequark (basically quark smoothed with cream for a yogurt-like consistency; it&#8217;s crazy delicious to make fruit salad with this) or kräuterquark (herbed quark smoothed with a small amount of liquid, whey or milk or sour cream or creme fraiche, and used as a spread) but I intend to do both. Yum!</p>

<p>(I&#8217;m NOT going to make quarkkuchen, german cheesecake, because I am trying to LOSE weight, not gain it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/05/07/quark-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>don&#8217;t ask me about cheesecloth</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/05/03/dont-ask-me-about-cheesecloth/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/05/03/dont-ask-me-about-cheesecloth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 04:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cultcher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why can&#8217;t a fella buy some non-stupidified kitchen tools, huh? 



I&#8217;m trying to make some quark and I need a nice sterile place to put 5 quarts of fermenting milk. I have a few 5-quart bowls, actually, but I&#8217;m going to use 5 quarts of liquid and it needs some sloshing room, so I really ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t a fella buy some non-stupidified kitchen tools, huh? </p>

<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark_(cheese)"><img src='http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d0/Twarog.jpg/280px-Twarog.jpg' alt='quark cheese (from wikimedia commons)' class='alignright' style="float:right;margin-left:3px;"/></a></p>

<p>I&#8217;m trying to make some <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark_(cheese)">quark</a> and I need a nice sterile place to put 5 quarts of fermenting milk. I have a few 5-quart bowls, actually, but I&#8217;m going to use <a href="http://www.math.wisc.edu/~meyer/Quark.html">5 quarts of liquid</a> and it needs some sloshing room, so I really need a 6 or 7-quart vessel.</p>

<p>I can&#8217;t use my 6-quart pot because it is still recovering from something incredibly dangerous and very stupid that I did to it the other day (that would be another story). </p>

<p><em>This would be a good time to get an actual stockpot</em>, thinks me. <em>Easy peasy</em>.</p>

<p>You&#8217;d think!</p>

<p>Sears had bupkis (lovely sale on flat, cast-iron prybars, though).<br />
Kohls had any number of N-piece kits (8 &lt; N &lt; 15) for between $99 and $300, plus a standalone Paula Deen-branded stockpot for something like $175.<br />
Gordman&#8217;s had a $13 stockpot that wasn&#8217;t worth $0.13; the inner surface was flaking off and seemed to involve <em>paint</em>, or some other coating so cheap and nasty as to seem paint-like.<br />
Wal-mart had a perfectly serviceable set of options. So I ended up spending my money at the Wal-mart. </p>

<p>This is all to my chagrin since I am, theoretically, opposed to Wal-mart. I mean, yeah, shady employment practices, union-busting, destroying local businesses, homogenization of local culture, etc., but I really just can&#8217;t stand how slowly their checkout lines move.</p>

<p>Anyway, my milk products are happily fermenting now. But I am still wishing for the opportunity to buy kitchen junkses without grinding my teeth to nubs in the process. Alton Brown keeps telling me to shop at restaurant supply stores, but I can&#8217;t find any such thing around here. I guess that&#8217;s why they invented <a href="http://www.bigtray.com">the webternets</a>.</p>

<p>Also: where the hell do I buy cheesecloth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/05/03/dont-ask-me-about-cheesecloth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>oldies but goodies</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/04/30/oldies-but-goodies/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/04/30/oldies-but-goodies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[daphne]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing new really, these are available in other formats elsewhere on the site, but I felt like adding these old Daphne videos to youtube. Frankly, it makes it easier for me to find them when I want them. 

Meantime, here&#8217;s some memory lane:



If those aren&#8217;t literally her first steps, they are close to it. I ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing new really, these are available in other formats elsewhere on the site, but I felt like adding these old Daphne videos to youtube. Frankly, it makes it easier for me to find them when I want them. </p>

<p>Meantime, here&#8217;s some memory lane:</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_xsdTaORBck&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_xsdTaORBck&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p>If those aren&#8217;t literally her first steps, they are close to it. I love how she&#8217;s telling herself &#8220;good job&#8221; there. Daphne is all about the self-affirmation.</p>

<p>Here she is a little older (20 months or so):</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/O-sywijpD1c&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/O-sywijpD1c&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/04/30/oldies-but-goodies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>one iowa</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/04/25/one-iowa/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/04/25/one-iowa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a happier note:



Haha, take that, haters! Ah, I just couldn&#8217;t leave the bitter angry stuff at the top of the ol&#8217; blog page.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a happier note:</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/33odacwy0y0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/33odacwy0y0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p>Haha, take that, haters! Ah, I just couldn&#8217;t leave the bitter angry stuff at the top of the ol&#8217; blog page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/04/25/one-iowa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>i want to puke with rage</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/04/23/i-want-to-puke-with-rage/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/04/23/i-want-to-puke-with-rage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Logically, there must be some point at which the actions of the Bush administration stop shocking me. A few people have spilled ink about outrage fatigue; the scandalous revelations of misconduct and terrible decisions over the last 8 years were so widespread and relentless that even the most dedicated of Bush haters had a hard ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logically, there must be some point at which the actions of the Bush administration stop shocking me. A few people have spilled ink about outrage fatigue; the scandalous revelations of misconduct and terrible decisions over the last 8 years were so widespread and relentless that even the most dedicated of Bush haters had a hard time keeping up with it all. Believe me, I tried.</p>

<p>But no, they were worse than my most ungenerous assumptions. </p>

<p>One of the takeaways of the torture memos is that we tortured some prisoners <em>hundreds of times</em>. There are not a lot of reasons to do that. Even the assholes who insist that torture produces useful intelligence (and it doesn&#8217;t) have to argue that the purpose of the torture is to get fast cooperation and data about imminent threats; that simply doesn&#8217;t apply if you&#8217;re torturing someone 6 times a day for more than a month.</p>

<p>So why keep it up? </p>

<p>Why, <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/04/and-where-the-whole-thing-becomes-a-movie-.html" title="unbelievable">to prove the link between Iraq and al-Qaeda</a>, of course.</p>

<p>Anyone paying a modicum of attention knew that Bush and the PNAC krewe who adopted him in the late 90s wanted to invade Iraq well before 9-11. They didn&#8217;t keep it a secret or anything. We knew that they were using 9-11 as a pretext to invade a country that had nothing to do with 9-11. </p>

<p>But at my very most cynical I didn&#8217;t think they would simply torture POWs to obtain false confessions to &#8220;prove&#8221; that nonexistent link. </p>

<p>As <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/22/grand-unified-scandal/">Paul Krugman points out</a>, the word for this is &#8220;evil&#8221;. This is unquestionably the kind of shit that we executed people for doing in WWII.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/04/23/i-want-to-puke-with-rage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>yay Iowa supremes!</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/04/03/yay-iowa-supremes/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/04/03/yay-iowa-supremes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s what I wrote to my state senator (with variations to my state rep, speaker of the house, governor, etc):


  Hi Senator Dvorsky,
  
  I&#8217;m writing to tell you how pleased I am at today&#8217;s Supreme Court ruling affirming the rights of Iowans to marry regardless of their sexual orientation. I am ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what I wrote to my state senator (with variations to my state rep, speaker of the house, governor, etc):</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Hi Senator Dvorsky,</p>
  
  <p>I&#8217;m writing to tell you how pleased I am at today&#8217;s Supreme Court ruling affirming the rights of Iowans to marry regardless of their sexual orientation. I am happy for my gay and lesbian friends and neighbors, and proud that Iowa continues its long tradition of bravery and leadership on civil rights issues.</p>
  
  <p>Please work with your Senate colleagues to ensure that this civil rights gain is not overturned. I know that opponents of this important decision are once again pushing a state constitutional amendment banning state recognition of marriages between same-sex partners. As was the case with the recent Proposition 8 fight in California, the legislative battle is likely to attract attention and money from organizations that would seek to restrict the rights of Iowans. Such organizations have proven their willingness to abuse civil law to impose their religious beliefs on others, against their will.</p>
  
  <p>Unlike California, Iowa has had the good sense to set a relatively high barrier to constitutional amendment. This policy recognizes that constitutional rights should not be subject to political whim. The personal rights defined in the Iowa Constitution include such bedrock principles as the right to life, property rights, freedom of speech and press, religious liberty, and equal protection under the law. I am glad to live in a state where the whim of 51% of the populace may not deprive the other 49% of these rights.</p>
  
  <p>High barriers notwithstanding, I hope and expect that you will oppose any attempt to pass a Proposition 8-style amendment through the state legislature. I do not want to see such a measure pass even one step in the process toward constitutional amendment.</p>
  
  <p>Today the Supreme Court has considered a difficult and divisive question and has come down squarely on the side of justice and liberty. Please know that this constituent appreciates that and hopes that you will help to protect it.</p>
  
  <p>Thanks,<br />
  (<em>my address and contact info</em>)</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/04/03/yay-iowa-supremes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>character audiotrack missing</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/03/24/character-audiotrack-missing/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/03/24/character-audiotrack-missing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cultcher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know what is up with the recent proliferation of Half-Life tribute films, but I knows I likes it!

This most recent entry is the subject of some debate, with some saying it is probably a student demoreel and others saying it probably cost way too much money and time for that. I must say ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what is up with the recent proliferation of <a href="http://orange.half-life2.com/hl2.html">Half-Life</a> tribute films, but I knows I likes it!</p>

<p>This most recent entry is the subject of some debate, with <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2009/03/20/short-film-whats-in.html#comment-446114">some saying it is probably a student demoreel</a> and others saying it probably cost way too much money and time for that. I must say the locations and effects work do seem very professional.</p>

<p><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IU_reTt7Hj4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IU_reTt7Hj4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object></p>

<p>This earlier effort is from a different source AFAIK, and remarkable for the blend of in-game video and real-life stuff. It&#8217;s not seamless or anything but it&#8217;s pretty good!</p>

<p><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/q1UPMEmCqZo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/q1UPMEmCqZo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object></p>

<p>Boy do I hope <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half_Life_2_Episode_3">episode 3</a> comes out soon. I am kind of done with l4d.</p>

<p>&lt;/NERDERY&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/03/24/character-audiotrack-missing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>social flow</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/03/16/social-flow/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/03/16/social-flow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

This doesn&#8217;t count deliberate reposts. This, I&#8217;m gonna repost everywhere. Just &#8216;cuz.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jackpinette/3359182078/" title="social flow by flwombat, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3650/3359182078_4a5ffa9647.jpg" width="500" height="464" alt="social flow" /></a></p>

<p>This doesn&#8217;t count deliberate reposts. This, I&#8217;m gonna repost <em>everywhere</em>. Just &#8216;cuz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/03/16/social-flow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>god hates figs</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/03/12/god-hates-figs/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/03/12/god-hates-figs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncategory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a photoset from a counter-protest against those Westboro Baptist jerkwads. The Chtulhu sign and the flyer about figs are both incredibly great.

   
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a photoset from a counter-protest against those Westboro Baptist jerkwads. The Chtulhu sign and the flyer about figs are both incredibly great.</p>

<p><object width="400" height="300"> <param name="flashvars" value="&#038;offsite=true&amp;lang=en-us&#038;page_show_url=%2Fphotos%2Ffroboy%2Fsets%2F72157614979271411%2Fshow%2F&#038;page_show_back_url=%2Fphotos%2Ffroboy%2Fsets%2F72157614979271411%2F&#038;set_id=72157614979271411&#038;jump_to="></param> <param name="movie" value="http://www.flickr.com/apps/slideshow/show.swf?v=67348"></param> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.flickr.com/apps/slideshow/show.swf?v=67348" allowFullScreen="true" flashvars="&#038;offsite=true&amp;lang=en-us&#038;page_show_url=%2Fphotos%2Ffroboy%2Fsets%2F72157614979271411%2Fshow%2F&#038;page_show_back_url=%2Fphotos%2Ffroboy%2Fsets%2F72157614979271411%2F&#038;set_id=72157614979271411&#038;jump_to=" width="400" height="300"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/03/12/god-hates-figs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>conservative porn</title>
		<link>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/03/11/conservative-porn/</link>
		<comments>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/03/11/conservative-porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cultcher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pinette.org/jack/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the silly ironies of the American political landscape have been well known: that the red states survive on federal largesse far more than the blue states, that southern evangelical christians are more likely to get divorced, etc. 

Recently we got to hear from the Republican governor of Louisiana about how volcano monitoring (which ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the silly ironies of the American political landscape have been well known: that the red states survive on federal largesse far more than the blue states, that southern evangelical christians are more likely to get divorced, etc. </p>

<p>Recently we got to hear from the Republican governor of Louisiana about how volcano monitoring (which is to say: <em>disaster preparedness</em>) is wasteful government pork almost in the same breath that he complained about the government&#8217;s failures during Katrina. This is maybe part of a jobs program for satirists, I dunno.</p>

<p>Anyway, one new data point, offered without commentary: <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16680-porn-in-the-usa-conservatives-are-biggest-consumers.html">guess who buys the most porn online</a>? States that voted for McCain, places with anti-gay-marriage laws, and Utah. Yep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pinette.org/jack/2009/03/11/conservative-porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
